You’ve probably seen many variations on the “it’s in the syllabus!!” joke, but sometimes, we instructors need to remember what’s in the syllabus, too. I’m teaching a new course this winter, and I’ve been working on the syllabus and course plan for over six months… which is perhaps why I discovered—two weeks into the term—that the submission date for one assignment was recorded as February 14th on one page, and March 14th on another. For the same course, I realized the day before our first class that the reading schedule in the syllabus was based on the table of contents from a book I’d swapped out for another. Thankfully, I can update the syllabus and post a revised schedule to Moodle (our LMS), and my students are forgiving and flexible!
The syllabus is often the first real contact between teacher and student. So what is a syllabus, and why does it matter?
You may have heard that the syllabus is a “contract.” While this is not technically true—there’s nothing legally binding about a syllabus—it does represent an understanding between teacher and student. The syllabus is the roadmap to your course; it communicates your expectations and sets the tone for the term. The syllabus should also be a reference for students, where they can find important dates, course policies, required materials, and so on. In short, a well-designed syllabus is a good start to a great course.
What Goes In
There’s a good chance that your institution has syllabus guidelines, and even templates. [It’s worth noting that in different countries or contexts, the syllabus may be referred to as the “course outline,” “course plan,” “national curriculum,” or “course profile.”]
In the freshman Composition courses I manage, there are several sections of each course, and each section is taught by a different instructor. The syllabus is my most important tool for maintaining consistency across the sections—I’ve designed a template for instructors, in which I’ve indicated which elements are fixed (things like the course learning objectives, main course text, and basic grading scheme), which ones are adaptable (supplemental readings, formative assessments, and so on), and which ones are discretionary (late submission policy, AI statement, office hours, etc.).
Regardless of whether you are using a template or not, there are some elements that are usually required by your institution, and some that are expected by your students.
Based on feedback from my own students, I think the Venn diagram of institutionally required and student-expected is two barely overlapping circles—so how you order the elements, or what navigational aids you use, can give students what they need while keeping the institution happy.
The Basics
Your contact information: Let students know when you’re on campus for office hours and your preferred methods of communication. I also offer virtual meetings—thank you, pandemic—which are really effective. I provide a link to a booking page in my syllabus, and students can set up a 15-minute Zoom call with me on days that I’m not on campus. I don’t bother providing a phone extension anymore, given that I genuinely hate telephone calls—email, Teams, LMS message, furtive note under my office door, Baker Street irregular, are all preferred means of contacting me.
Course description: this should be the same as what appears elsewhere (the academic calendar, the website, the LMS page, and so on). The description is typically a paragraph that provides a broad overview of the topics and perspectives of the course.
Learning objectives: what can students expect to know, and be able to do, by the time they complete the course? Use a bulleted list with action verbs—Bloom’s taxonomy is the perfect starting point for this. Learning objectives also become the reference point for everything else: assessments should be clearly tied to the objectives, and Backward Design says we take those assessments and work backward to what we need to teach when.
Required Texts and Materials: What do students need to have for this course? Ideally, let them know where they can find these things: campus bookstore, publisher site, used bookstore, library course reserves, etc.
Assessments and Grading: What will students have to do, and how much of their grade is each assignment worth? Ideally, include at least a synopsis of each major assignment. I often create two versions of the syllabus; one is the bare-bones version, while the other explains every graded task, including formative steps, UDL options, and evaluation rubrics. I also include a table that explains what each of the letter grades means (see below).
Course Schedule: What happens when? What do students need to prepare for the week? What are you covering in a given class? For me, this is often the most challenging element—what if it takes us longer to get through something? What if I discover (as I have with this new course) that there’s an important topic I omitted? I always include a caveat in the syllabus that the schedule is subject to change, but students are still thrown if there is an actual change (to be fair, they’re sometimes thrown when there’s no change, but they forgot to check the schedule and are now getting reminders that something is due this week).
The CYA Elements
The bits that are dictated by your institution are, let’s face it, the EUA of the academic world. Students don’t read them, for a few reasons – for one thing, they are the same on every other syllabus, so why would they read, for the fifteenth time, about cheating and plagiarism? As one of my students put it, someone who is going to cheat won’t be deterred by a couple of paragraphs on your syllabus. BUT, as I said to him, that’s pretty much why those bits are there.
Policy statements in your syllabus aren’t there so students learn the policy. They are there so if the policy is breached, you—and the perpetrator—know the consequences. In my tech writing course, we call these elements the CYAs: they cover your ass. If your syllabus makes it clear (1) what plagiarism is, (2) that it’s not acceptable, and (3) these are the consequences, then it becomes an applicable tool. Given the nature of these elements of the syllabus, consider placing them at the end of the document, or, if your institution allows, provide links rather than the comprehensive text.
CYA is true for your specific policies as well. Take submission deadlines, for example: unless time management is part of my learning objectives, I never apply late penalties or refuse late submissions. Another teacher in a comparable course might accept late work, but deduct 5% for every day beyond the deadline. Another might accept late work without penalty, but not provide feedback. Yet another might not accept late work at all. The key is that all of us should make this clear in our syllabus, so our students know what’s expected in each course. Other policies to consider are your rules surrounding attendance, absences, and accommodations.
Students and teachers rely on the syllabus to provide a framework for the course. Give your syllabus the time and brainpower it needs to be that solid framework—and give it a read once in a while, during the term, and see if things are on track. I make notes on my current syllabus so that when I teach the course in the future, I can craft an even stronger outline.
One final note: Speak to your students where they are. If you’re teaching an advanced course in a specialized topic, maybe discipline-specific jargon and technical terms will work; use those same terms and vocabulary with an undergraduate introductory course and you’ll lose students before they’ve ever set foot in your classroom. If you’re not sure if you’re hitting the right tone, consider asking a former student, a colleague, or even an AI platform to give you some feedback.
Share your own tips, and your own “oops” moments, in the comments!
Bonus Content!
Interpreting Letter Grades
Letter | % | GPA | Range | Overall | Your work demonstrates: |
A+ | 90-100 | 4.30 | A | Excellent, exceptional work | Your work not only meets all the criteria for this assignment, but demonstrates originality, creativity, professionalism, and exceptional engagement in the project. You have clearly gone above and beyond the basic requirements, and your organization, critical thinking, and understanding of the key concepts are outstanding. Meets well, or even exceeds, expectations for this level and topic. |
A | 85-89 | 4.00 | |||
A- | 80-84 | 3.70 | |||
B+ | 77-79 | 3.30 | B | Strong, competent work | Your work clearly and strongly meets all the criteria for this assignment. You have clearly engaged yourself in this project, and have demonstrated good organization, critical thinking, and a strong grasp of the key concepts. Meets expectations for this level and topic—there’s room for improvement, but continuing to work at this level will lead to success in the course. |
B | 73-76 | 3.00 | |||
B- | 70-72 | 2.70 | |||
C+ | 67-69 | 2.30 | C | Acceptable work | Your work basically meets most or all the criteria for this assignment. You have engaged yourself in the project, but your organization, thinking, and understanding of the key concepts is limited. Satisfies the minimum expectations for this level and topic—you should be aiming for better performance in subsequent assignments. |
C | 63-66 | 2.00 | |||
C- | 60-62 | 1.70 | |||
D+ | 57-59 | 1.30 | D | Acceptable but unsatisfactory work | Your work struggles to meet the criteria for this assignment. It is not clear that you have engaged yourself in the project, and your work lacks organization and critical thinking. You seem to be unclear on some of the key concepts. Fails to meet the minimum requirements for this level and topic—you need to perform better in subsequent assignments to succeed in this course. |
D | 53-56 | 1.00 | |||
D- | 50-52 | 0.70 | |||
F | <50 | F | Unacceptable work | Your work fails to meet the minimum criteria for this assignment. You do not appear to have engaged yourself in the project, and your work is disorganized and lacks understanding of the basic concepts. Unacceptable for this level and topic—you need to perform significantly better in subsequent assignments if you intend to continue in this course. Note that this grade will also be assigned to any work not submitted. |